Legal Opinion
Etten v. Kauffman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 17, 1941No. 7528PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs brought suit in the District Court under R.S. 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, seeking to obtain an adjudication that they are legally entitled to have a patent issue for an alleged invention in accordance with the claims in Etten application No. 648,409, filed December 22, 1932. Interference proceedings in the Patent Office between Etten, of The Chamberlain Corporation, and Kauffman, of Lovell Manufacturing Company, developed two interfering Kauffman applications (Nos. 621,-921 and 621,922), both filed July 11, 1932. The Patent Office awarded priority of invention…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Corning Glass Works, in No. 15923 v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corporation, in No. 15924Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Moon v. Cabot Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Hazeltine Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Marcyan v. Nissen Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.