Legal Opinion

Smith v. Snow

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1935No. 102PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Certiorari was granted to review a decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 70 F. (2d) 564, which reversed the decree of the district court and held valid, but not infringed, the first claim of the Smith Patent, No. 1,262,860, of April 16, 1918, for an improved apparatus and method for the incubation of eggs. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held the same claim valid and infringed in Waxham v. Smith 70 F. (2d) 457, in which case certiorari was also granted. The question thus presented is one of the scope of the claim.. Only so much of the patent as relates to a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API