Legal Opinion

Marcyan v. Nissen Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 16, 1982No. S 80-322PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge.

I

This will state the legal basis for the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered here.

This is an action for patent infringement brought by plaintiff, Walter Marcyan, owner of U.S. Letters Patent Re 28,066, entitled “Single Station Multi-Purpose Body Exercising Device”, and his licensee, Marcy Gymnasium Equipment Company (Marcy Gym), against defendants, Nissen Corporation (Nissen) and Universal Gym Equipment, Inc. (UGEI).

Only claims 7 and 8 of the patent are asserted to be infringed by defendants’ devices known as the Power-Pak Models 200 and…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Seven-Up Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers S.A. v. American Institute of PhysicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Brown v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  4. State v. American TV & Appliance of Madison, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. American Needle & Novelty, Inc. v. Drew Pearson Marketing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API