Legal Opinion

Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. Winters

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 14, 1929No. 4 and 14PublishedCited by 407 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

These are two suits in equity relating to letters patent No. 1,385,102 for improvements in latches, issued to Winters and Crampton July 19, 1921. They were heard together here. The invalidity of the two general claims of the patent, 5 and 6, has been conceded, and the issues here are limited to the five specific claims, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.

In No. 4 — hereinafter referred to as the Sanitary case— Winters and Crampton brought suit in the Eastern District of Wisconsin against the Sanitary Refrigerator Co. for infringement of the patent by the latch which it used in the manufacture of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  5. Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by407 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Hughes Aircraft Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

402 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API