Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike and Granting the Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court as the final battle in an enduring litigation war. At issue in this patent case is whether evidence that the plaintiffs discovered after the court granted summary judgment to the defendants requires the court to modify its previous decision. Also at issue is the plaintiffs’ motion to strike two declarations submitted by the defendants in support of their renewed motion for summary judgment. Because…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. Science Applications International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Ng v. LahoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Brooks v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.