Fox v. Sutton
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, granting an injunction. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
On the death of Stephen Powell Burdick there was on deposit in the First National Bank of Oakland some five thousand two hundred and eighty-one dollars and sixty-four cents standing in the name of “S. P. Burdick, Atty.” This money was claimed by the plaintiff, as executor, as belonging to and being part of the estate of said Stephen Powell Bur-dick, and was also claimed by the defendants, A. M. Sutton and Arthur W. Burdick, as alleged trustees, by title adverse to said estate. Under these circumstances the bank refused to pay over the money to either the executor or the trustees, unless the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woodmen of the World v. RutledgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- First National Bank v. ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
- Kent v. County Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Santa Monica Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lackmann v. KlauenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906