Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Santa Monica Finance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1960No. Civ. No. 24157PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

The defendant has appealed from the granting of a preliminary injunction.

The verified complaint, upon the basis of which the pre*213liminary injunction was issued, contains allegations as follows: 1. The plaintiff is a corporation and qualified to transact and actually engaged in transacting a general insurance and surety-ship business in the state of California. 2. Defendant is a corporation engaged in transacting business in the county of Los Angeles. 3. Douglass V. Neale, at all times mentioned in the complaint, was licensed as a used-automobile dealer under the laws of the state of California…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Kurlan v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kane v. MendenhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Trans-Pacific Trading Co. v. Patsy Frock & Romper Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. McPhetridge v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cronus Investments, Inc. v. Concierge Services, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API