Lackmann v. Klauenberg
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after order sustaining demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint. The action was brought to compel the defendants, Sophie Klauenberg and P. W. Webber to interplead as to their rights to a sum of money in the hands of plaintiff. The demurrer is a general one, filed by the Klauenbergs, and the question presented is as to the correctness of the ruling of the court sustaining the demurrer; in other words, does the complaint state a case sufficient to entitle plaintiff to a judgment that the defendants interplead as to their rights to the money in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bullard v. McArdleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Gillmore v. American Central InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Holmes v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
- McKinney v. KuhnMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williams v. GilmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942