Legal Opinion

Woodmen of the World v. Rutledge

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1901No. L.A. No. 912PublishedCited by 24 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

By stipulation of the parties, a motion to dismiss the appeal and the hearing on the merits of the appeal have been submitted together. The motion to dismiss the appeal is based upon the ground that the appellant’s attorney is not the attorney of record in the case, but a member of the firm of attorneys who appeared in the court below as attorneys of record. There is nothing in the motion and no authority has been cited in support of this contention.

The action was brought to compel the defendants to come into court and interpíéad, and litigate their several conflicting claims to a benSfit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. San Francisco Savings Union v. E. B. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Winterhalter v. Workmen's Guarantee Fund Assn. of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Fox v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Conner v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Northern Life Ins. Co. v. BurkholderOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Jules Levy & Bro. v. A. Mautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Starkweather v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API