Legal Opinion

Leveridge v. Notaras

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1967No. 41566PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice:

This appeal involves an action in which the principal relief sought by defendant in error, a Stillwater resident, hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”, was the recovery of the $1450.00 he paid for a used sports car, or automobile, he purchased from the Leveridge Motor Company of Oklahoma City, on February 16, 1963.

At the time the transaction occurred, a written document entitled “SALES ORDER AGREEMENT” was signed both by plaintiff, and by one “Rusty” Eidson, as salesman, for said Company. In the printed portion of said form agreement was the following recital:

“I agree to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Spence v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Liberty Plan Co. v. Francis T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Southard v. Oil Equipment CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. United Engines, Inc. v. McConnell Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Nanji v. National Geographic SocietyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  5. Tiger Flats Production Co. v. Oklahoma Petroleum Extracting Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API