Legal Opinion

Southard v. Oil Equipment Corporation

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1956No. 37035PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, Oil Equipment Corporation, for the possession of certain oil well casing and for the money rental due thereon under the terms of an alleged written contract. The defendants, Roy Pooler who was personally seryed with summons, and Joseph D. Fitzgerald, Thomas W. Martin, Betty C. Martin, Chloe Mills, John B. Webber, Ed Webber, Nettie Webber, Edmund Donnohue, Cosette Donnohue, Verne C. Eitemiller who were nonresidents and were served by publication are the appellants here. The other defendants are bound by the judgment. The parties will…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Fisher v. FiskeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Bearman v. BrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Heaton v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Edwards v. HardwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Brotherton v. KissingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Steincamp v. SteincampSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. GUFFEY v. OSTONAKULOVSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API