Legal Opinion

Spence v. State Nat. Bank of El Paso

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1928No. 840 — 4906PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

Plaintiffs in error, husband and wife, filed this suit against Frank B. Hadlock and State National Bank, the first count in the petition being in the usual form of trespass to try title to recover lots 1, 2, and 3, and the westerly 60 feet of lot 4 in block 264 of Campbell’s addition to the city of El Paso, Tex., the property being a three-story brick building known as the Lucerne Apartments. In the second count of the petition the plaintiffs set up that defendant Hadlock was claiming the property in controversy under a judgment in a former suit and a sale made thereunder by a receiver…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Chilson v. ReevesTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Moran v. Miller, State Fire MarshalIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Spence v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Farmers' State Bank v. FosheeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Bayoud v. Bayoud, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Security Trust Co. v. Lipscomb CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Allison v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API