Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1991No. 71423, 71422PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Chief Justice.

The dispositive issue in these two taxpayer qui tam 1 actions is whether city officials violated the law in disbursing the funds in question. In No. 71,423 the questions tendered are: [1] Did the plaintiff timely bring an appeal from the dismissal of the qui tam action as to two defendants (city personnel board members)? [2] Should this appeal be dismissed because a so-called “consent judgment” was rendered for the City? and [8] Was summary judgment correctly given to the remaining defendants? We answer the first and second questions in the negative and the third in the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Marvin v. TroutSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Mayhue v. MayhueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Fent v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Phillips v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API