State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of Moore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Chief Justice.
The dispositive issue in these two taxpayer qui tam 1 actions is whether city officials violated the law in disbursing the funds in question. In No. 71,423 the questions tendered are: [1] Did the plaintiff timely bring an appeal from the dismissal of the qui tam action as to two defendants (city personnel board members)? [2] Should this appeal be dismissed because a so-called “consent judgment” was rendered for the City? and [8] Was summary judgment correctly given to the remaining defendants? We answer the first and second questions in the negative and the third in the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Marvin v. TroutSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Mayhue v. MayhueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Phillips v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Fent v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Phillips v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.