Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 17, 1990No. 65297PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.
The dispositive question is whether the trial judge’s verdict, which implicitly finds that the two defendants did not bear secondary liability under § 11,1 is supported by competent evidence. We answer in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
The plaintiff, Sam Bradley, Jr. [worker], sustained on-the-job injuries on October 28, *42719812 in an oil field accident. He brought a negligence action against Clark Operating Services [Operator or hirer] and Dean Clark [individual interest holder or Clark], All the issues were stipulated except as to the two defendants’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Lewis v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Weber v. Armco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Rowe v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- K & H Well Service, Inc. v. Tcina, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Sides v. John Cordes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- J.M. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.