Legal Opinion

Lovekin v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1924No. Appeal, 47PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Mr. Justice Simpson,

When appellees were appointed receivers of the Tindel-Morris Company, there were two unsettled accounts between that company and appellant, who was defendant below. The two were exactly alike except as to dates and amounts, and hence only one need be detailed. In it the receivers claimed $9,614.83 for certain materials delivered to defendant; the latter alleged that the goods were not of the quality contracted for, and claimed to recoup $2,920 because thereof. No agreement of settlement or compromise was made, but defendant sent to plaintiff a check for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dimmick v. Banning, Cooper & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Snowiss v. Elias Loeb & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Russell v. SicklesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
  4. Clay v. RossiIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Durkin v. Everhot Heater Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API