Legal Opinion

Fairchild v. Mathews

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1966No. 9550PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEAR, Justice.

This is an action brought by respondent, Arthur A. Fairchild, to recover the balance claimed due and owing on a contract for labor and services performed on appellant’s land.

During the month of March or April, 1961, Fairchild and appellant’s nephew entered into an oral agreement for certain land leveling work to be performed on a portion of Mathews’ land known as the “Home Forty” upon which Mathews’ residence was located. Pursuant to said agreement respondent furnished a D7 caterpillar tractor, a scraper and other allied equipment such as a ripper and dozer, and an operator for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Nichols v. KnowlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Freedman v. HendershottIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Jackson v. Blue Flame Gas CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Shore v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Interform Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Dale's Service Company, Inc. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API