Legal Opinion

Russell v. Sickles

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1932No. Appeal, 348PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This suit was brought by L. George Russell for money alleged to be due him under an employment contract made on March 31,1904, with the defendants, M. Sickles & Sons, a partnership engaged in the wholesale jewelry business, and for the unpaid purchase price of certain machinery sold by him to them. The verdict was for the plaintiff in the full amount of his claim.

The contract of March 31, 1904, was made by Russell and his brother, Robert C. Russell, and the defendants, and provided that the Russells were to be employed “as workmen and acting foremen of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Dillon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Hill & MacMillan, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Nicolella v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. LeDonne v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Furjanick EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Grubb v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API