Legal Opinion

Durkin v. Everhot Heater Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 37,530PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

On February 7, 1930, defendant, a manufacturer of water heaters, at Detroit, Michigan, employed plaintiff as a national director of its so-called home sales division for a period of 10 years beginning March 1, 1930. The written contract was for a salary of $750 per month during the first two years and an additional provision for commission on sales; and during the remaining eight years compensation was wholly on a commission basis. In accordance with the contract plaintiff’s employment began March 1, 1930. His activities were largely, if not wholly, in eastern States. He continued until…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Sanders v. Standard Wheel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Shaw v. United Motors Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Lovekin v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Puffer v. State Mutual Rodded Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Puett v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. National Mutual Insurance v. Quality Builders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Baker v. EmmersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  5. Fuller v. Integrated Metal Technology, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API