Legal Opinion
United States v. Skinner & Eddy Corporation
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 25, 1928No. 9124PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The defendant moved the court that the report signed as auditor be considei'ed and treated as if signed as master in chancery, the two reports to be considered by the court as signed in both capacities of special master and auditor; and, second, that the evidence reported and filed with the report be considered by the court in the same way as any evidence taken and reported by a master in chancery is usually considered by the court. The court at the time denied the first part of the motion, and as to the second part said the report will be admitted and…
2Cases cited106 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- North Dakota-Montana Wheat Growers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Ralph Sykes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Czarnikow-Rionda Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.