Legal Opinion
Duluth Superior Erection, Inc. v. Concrete Restorers, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 2003No. C1-02-1831PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
In challenging the district court’s grant of summary judgment, appellants argue that (1) summary judgment was inappropriate because there are genuine issues of material fact; (2) as to certain appellants, the district court erred by finding a presumption of liability and shifting the burden of proof under Minn.Stat. § 514.02 (2002); (3) the district court erred by finding that appellants breached a fiduciary duty pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 514.02; (4) the district court erred by entering judgment against appellants jointly and severally pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 514.02;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Lundgren v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reshetar Systems, Inc. v. Scott ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- State v. BrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. v. Peak Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- T.E.S. Construction, Inc. v. ChiciloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010