Legal Opinion

Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. v. Peak Mechanical, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 2004No. A04-131PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge. *

In this action brought under Minn.Stat. § 514.02 (2002) of the mechanics’ lien statute, appellant Associated Bank Minnesota, N.A. (bank), appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of respondent Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. (Siemens). Siemens sought to recover monies paid to defendant Peak Mechanical, Inc. (Peak), from the foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien. The bank had a prior secured interest in the proceeds paid to Peak.

Because the clear language of Minn. Stat. § 514.02 does not apply to a third party who receives payment in the ordinary course…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. James Talcott, Inc. v. Franklin Nat. Bank of Mpls.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. First National Bank of the North v. Automotive Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Duluth Superior Erection, Inc. v. Concrete Restorers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. T.E.S. Construction, Inc. v. ChiciloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API