Legal Opinion
Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 6, 1987No. C6-85-2340PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
401 N.W.2d 655 (1987)
William BECKER, Respondent,
v.
ALLOY HARDFACING & ENGINEERING COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, Appellants.
No. C6-85-2340.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
March 6, 1987.
Jan Stuurmans, Minneapolis, for appellants.
Thomas M. Neuville, Northfield, for respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Respondent William Becker ("Becker") filed suit against appellants Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Company ("Alloy") and Alloy's officers William Aulik and his son Mark Aulik, seeking damages for defamation, unpaid wages, and wage penalties following his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Anderson v. KammeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Dave Thomas v. United Steelworkers Local 1938Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.