Lundgren v. Eustermann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
In this case we conclude that plaintiffs’ expert, a licensed consulting psychologist, is not qualified to give opinions in a medical malpractice action on the standard of care required of the defendant medical doctor. We reverse the contrary ruling of the court of appeals.
Plaintiff-respondents Judith Lundgren and her husband, Gary, sued defendant-appellant John Eustermann, M.D., claiming Dr. Eustermann was negligent in treating Judith’s mental and emotional illness with the drug Thorazine. Plaintiffs included in their complaint a separate count for punitive damages. Dr.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. ChattertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Pearce v. LindeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Duran v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Bell v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.