Legal Opinion

State v. Blaney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 18, 1990No. B67-672; CA A60903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals an order revoking suspended imposition of sentence and imposing sentence. We affirm, because the issue that he raises is beyond the scope of our review.

Defendant pled guilty to fraudulent use of a credit card. ORS 165.055. The maximum sentence that he could have received was one year imprisonment. ORS 161.615. In May, 1986, pursuant to former ORS 137.010, 1 the court suspended imposition of sentence for three years, subject to several conditions, but did not place defendant on probation. In December, 1986, the court changed one condition but continued the suspension. In May,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. ReimersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API