Legal Opinion

State v. Reimers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 1990No. B68-253; CA A62647PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals an order revoking his probation and imposing a one-year sentence. He contends that the court lacked authority to impose the sentence. We reverse and remand.

Defendant pleaded guilty to theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045, and was placed on five years probation. The order of probation did not provide that either imposition or execution of sentence was suspended.1 At a subsequent hearing on an order to show cause why probation should not be revoked, defendant admitted that he had violated various conditions of probation. The court revoked his probation and sentenced him to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VasbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. BlaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. EmmichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Cassell v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API