Legal Opinion

State v. Bateman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1989No. C85-08-33209 C85-10-34220 CA A47683 (Control) A47684PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*459RICHARDSON, J.

In these consolidated cases defendant appeals from what he denominates “judgments” revoking his probation. His sole contention is that certain conditions of probation are unlawful and cannot be the basis for revocation. We conclude that the issue raised is beyond the scope of our review and affirm.

Defendant was charged in two indictments with three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. He pleaded no contest to one count in each indictment, and the third count was dismissed. He stipulated that he met the criteria of ORS 426.675(2) and, as a consequence, the court found him…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. JairlOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. BlaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API