Legal Opinion

Emmanuel v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1929No. Appeal, 60PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiffs seek recovery from defendant of the balance due on two promissory notes dated September 30, 1925, for $2,000 each, one maturing September 30, 1926, and the other September 30, 1927. On the one maturing September 30, 1926, defendant on April 23, 1927, made a payment of $500 on account of principal. Defendant has also paid $320 on account of interest due on the two notes. In the court below judgment was entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and defendant appeals.

The defense set up was that the notes were given as part payment for a lot…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Wagner v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Humphrey Et Ux. v. Brown Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Crick v. PaullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Milling Co. v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Sokoloff v. StrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Hein v. FetzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Palone v. MoschettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Marshall v. MacGregor Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API