Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Garland
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This is an action of assumpsit to recover the amount due on a promissory note executed by defendants. The court below entered judgment for plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense for the amount claimed and defendants have appealed.
The suit has its foundation in an agreement twice considered by us (Bailey’s Est., 276 Pa. 147; Bailey’s Est., 287 Pa. 478) in other aspects than that in which it is now to be viewed. The statement of claim sets forth the agreement signed by defendants in which they admit that the Garland Chain Company, a partnership of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Cridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Piper v. QueeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Second National Bank v. YeagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Evans v. EdelsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- International Milling Co. v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Sokoloff v. StrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Citizens' Bk. of Wind Gap v. LipschitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- United States National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Hein v. FetzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.