Legal Opinion
Sokoloff v. Strick
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 26, 1961No. Appeal, No. 219PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Bell,
Plaintiffs filed a complaint in Equity which concededly did not set forth adequate grounds for equitable relief. After defendant’s preliminary objections were sustained, an amended complaint was filed. The lower Court again sustained defendant’s preliminary objections and gave plaintiffs leave to file another amended complaint in order to aver “fraud, accident or mistake” with particularity, as required by Pennsylvania R. C. P. 1019(b). This requirement was not only in accordance with the rule of court, but likewise with the decisions of this Court: Palone v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Grubb v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank, N.A., in No. 90-3712 v. First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments, in No. 90-3790Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Deligiannis v. PepsiCo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Contractor Utility Sales Co. v. Certain-teed Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.