Legal Opinion

Crick v. Paull

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1926No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Sadleb,

While engaged in engineering work in northwestern Pennsylvania, Crick, the plaintiff, became interested in the water supply of the valleys through which flowed the Clarion River, and certain other streams of water. These he examined with a view to their possible development for the generation of electricity. He made surveys, plans and maps, and, in 1905, associated himself with three others, with a view of organizing to make use of the natural resources which existed. Efforts to secure the necessary financial support were unavailing, and it was not until 1910 that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Miller v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Knorr v. KnorrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Brooks v. ConstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. William Sellers & Co. v. Clarke-Harrison, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Rupniewski Et Ux. v. MiazgaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Oreovecz v. MericsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API