Legal Opinion

Hein v. Fetzer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1930No. Appeal, 139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

On March 13, 1929, plaintiff, by virtue of a warrant which empowered any attorney to appear at “any term” of court and enter judgment, caused judgment to be entered against defendant on a promissory note dated July 23, 1927, and payable.at the expiration of two years, the warrant accompanying the note in question. On July 30, 1929, defendant petitioned the court below to open the judgment; whereupon that tribunal allowed a rule to show cause, at the same time ordering that execution, already issued, be stayed in excess of $1,768.73, pending the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Wagner v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. United States National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Citizens National Bank v. WisecarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. International Milling Co. v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Boyd EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Levin v. GarfinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Palone v. MoschettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Helzlsouer, to Use v. GolubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API