Legal Opinion

Marshall v. MacGregor Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1934No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

In this action of ejectment, after verdict for defendants conditioned on paying $800 to plaintiff, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for judgment n. o. v. Defendants have appealed.

Plaintiff made out a clear record title. Defendants, while conceding that title, stood on alleged oral agreements of sale to them, made by plaintiff’s predecessor in title, and reaffirmed by plaintiff; they contend that, while the agreements were oral, they made improvements on the land, in circumstances which would entitle them to specific performance and, therefore, constitute a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Hart v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  3. Moore v. SmallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  4. Brown v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Coates v. CotteralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kurland v. StolkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Markovitz v. Markovitz Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Kait v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Martinek v. KiraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Williams v. BeckmarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API