Nutting v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Albert Lee Stephens, City Attorney, Charles S. Burnell, Assistant City Attorney, and Arthur M. Ellis, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Appeal by the defendants from the judgment. By his action the plaintiff seeks to have it determined that an assessment levied against his property to pay expenses of a street-opening proceeding is void; to enjoin the defendants from proceeding to enforce the assessment; and to quiet his title against said assessment. The prayer of his complaint further demands that under and by virtue of article 26a of the Street Opening Act of 1913, as amended [Stats. 1913, p. 433], (being the act under which the proposed street opening has been conducted), the defendant city of Los Angeles and its officers…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Cake v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- United Real Estate & Tr. Co. v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cutting v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Maxwell v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Fitzwilliam v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Fitzwilliam v. the City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Murphy v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.