Legal Opinion

Cake v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1913No. L.A. No. 2980PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

After general demurrer sustained to her complaint, judgment was entered for defendant and plaintiff appeals upon the judgment-roll. By her complaint she seeks, to recover from the city of Los Angeles moneys paid by her under a street assessment', which moneys she alleges were paid by compulsion and under protest. The complaint charges in two counts. In the first, allegations are set forth upon which it is contended the assessment was void. By the second, the illegality of the assessment is not asserted, but it is alleged that plaintiff was compelled to pay a sum greater than that for which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Wheeler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Fay v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Abbott v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API