Legal Opinion
Ripling v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 24, 1952No. Civ. 19079PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Mildred Ripling and William J. Ripling seek a peremptory writ prohibiting respondent court from proceeding without a jury in the case of Norton v. Ripling (L. A. Super. Ct. No. 556274). It is not questioned that prohibition is a proper remedy.
On February 25, 1949, Richard Norton, as guardian of the estate of Thomas J. Norton, incompetent, filed an action against Mildred Ripling, sister of Thomas. (Thomas died in 1950 and Richard now appears as administrator.) The complaint was in two counts, the first pleading facts, the second a common count for money had and received. In substance the first…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Dettenborn v. Hartford-National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Farrell v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Paularena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. Javier A.California Court of Appeal · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.