Legal Opinion

Austin v. Wilcoxson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1906No. Sac. No. 1272PublishedCited by 34 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that Jackson Wilcoxson and Jefferson Wilcoxson were her granduncles ; that on or about the tenth day of March, 1885, Jackson Wilcoxson delivered to Jefferson Wilcoxson the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars, to be held in trust for, and to be paid to, plaintiff at the time of the death of Jefferson Wilcoxson; that Jefferson Wilcoxson accepted the trust and took possession of the seventy-five thousand dollars; that Jefferson Wilcoxson died in the city and county of Sacramento on the eighth day of April, 1898; that he did not deliver to plaintiff in his lifetime,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API