Legal Opinion

Rench v. McMullen

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1947No. Civ. 13350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to enforce an alleged resulting trust against McMullen. Pending the action McMullen died and the executor and executrix of his will were substituted as defendants. They filed a cross-complaint to quiet title and judgment went for defendants and cross-complainants.

The real property involved in the litigation was purchased by McMullen under an arrangement worked out by appellant Rench with the vendor. It is admitted that McMullen was the signatory to the original option to purchase and that McMullen made the down payment on the property and paid the balance of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Huth v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. HardwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. G. R. Holcomb Estate Co. v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Olson v. OlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baskett v. CrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Glasgow v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Toney v. NolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Estate of SchechtmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API