Legal Opinion

People v. Knight

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1939No. Crim. 1701PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, P. J. —

Defendant was convicted of driving a vehicle upon a highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (sec. 502, Vehicle Code), and from such conviction, and an order denying a new trial, he prosecutes this appeal.

As grounds therefor, appellant contends the information fails to state a public offense, and that it is uncertain and ambiguous. It is alleged in the information, following the language of the statute, that: “On or about the 10th day of June, 1939, in the County of Mendocino, State of California, said defendant did then and there wilfully and unlawfully drive a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. BartnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Matter of Application of WorthingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. People v. HoenschleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. StansberryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API