Legal Opinion

Wright v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1997No. S053938PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

When a registered sex offender changes his or her residence address, the offender must notify the law enforcement agency of last registration within a specified period. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (f); further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) Prior to January 1, *5241995, failure to provide such notification was a misdemeanor; thereafter, the Legislature declared it a felony. (Stats. 1994, ch. 867, § 2.7.) The question before us is whether felony prosecution is prohibited as ex post facto if the defendant’s address change and failure to notify occurred…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. TranbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. United States v. CoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Johnson v. Department of JusticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. BrittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API