Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Worthington

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1913No. Crim. No. 284PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It appearing to the court that the act which petitioner is charged with having violated is one entitled, an act governing the use of automobiles upon public highways, and it not being averred in the complaint that the defendant used or operated his automobile upon a public highway, the complaint failed to state any public offense, and for that reason it is ordered that petitioner be discharged, and that the money deposited in lieu of bail be returned.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dorris v. McKamyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. People v. StansberryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. In Re HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. HoenschleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API