Legal Opinion

People v. Castro

California Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1901No. Crim. No. 704PublishedCited by 96 opinions

Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, Henry A. Melvin, and J. W. Curtis, District Attorney of San Bernardino County, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

—Defendant was convicted of the crime of rape. The superior court granted a motion for a new trial, and the state appeals. The offense is alleged by the information to have been committed upon June 30, 1899, and the prosecutrix was alleged to have been under the age of consent. At the-trial, four separate acts of sexual intercourse committed by defendant were sworn to by the prosecutrix. These acts were proven under objection of defendant, and covered a period of time extending over several months. No one of the acts was proven to have been committed upon the thirtieth day of June. It is not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State v. HilbergUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. RussoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. DiedrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API