Legal Opinion

People v. Stansberry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1966No. Crim. 11878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHANTRY, J. pro tem. *

Vehicle Code, section 20002, subdivision (a) apply to a “hit and run” accident occurring upon private property and resulting in injury to private property? This is the question presented in this proceeding.

Defendant was charged in the municipal court with a violation of section 20002, subdivision (a) 1 in that he “did wilfully and unlawfully drive a vehicle which was involved in an accident resulting only in damage to property, and did wilfully and unlawfully fail, neglect and refuse to immediately stop such vehicle at the scene of such accident and comply with…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. ScofieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. H. S. Mann Corp. v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. McKeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Byers v. Justice Court for Ukiah Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. BuddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. O'DONNELL v. MullaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API