Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1901No. Crim. No. 688PublishedCited by 111 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

The defendant was convicted upon a charge of rape upon the person of a child aged thirteen. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

As I think the judgment must be reversed, many of the points made will not require consideration. Only those will be noticed, other than the one which necessitates a reversal, which may be necessary for the guidance of the court upon a retrial.

The briefs contain a long discussion as to the sufficiency of the evidence. It is not claimed that there was not sufficient evidence, if the prosecuting witness was worthy of credence. But her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HilbergUtah Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. RussoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API