Legal Opinion

Ruediger v. Klink

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 41, Calendar 46,743PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Plaintiff’s declaration only is before us. Such of the presented questions as are brought here must of necessity draw decision from and within the 4 corners thereof. In proper form it states a cause of action under the so-called civil damage act * against a group of Bay county dramsellers pictur esquely identified as Corky’s Bar, Commodore Bar,Old Bar, Rufe’s Bar, Pearl and Jerry’s, Patterson’s Tavern, Ace of Clubs, Blue Ribbon Bar, and Charlie’s Bar. Likewise in proper form it states a cause of action for negligence against a motorist — one Burtenshaw. The cause-uniting allegation plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Welch v. WareMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Higdon v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Friend v. DunksMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Albert v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Manuel v. WeitzmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Lapasinskas v. QuickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. McCullough v. Ward Trucking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Mason v. LovinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API