Legal Opinion

Lapasinskas v. Quick

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1969No. Docket 3,322PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Plaintiff Prank Lapasinskas was struck by a motor vehicle operated by the defendant Gary Quick and owned by the defendant Earl Quick. He appeals from a denial of his motion for new trial following a jury verdict of no cause of action.

At the time of the accident Prank Lapasinskas was two years of age. His cause of action and his father’s separate cause of action were both stated in one complaint. The defendants’ answer asserted as an affirmative defense that the' accident was caused by the child running out from behind parked cars into the defendant’s vehicle and that' the father was negligent…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hill v. Harbor Steel & Supply Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Elbert v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. McCullough v. Ward Trucking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Felice v. WeinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Clark v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fenimore v. Donald M. Drake Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. First Premier Bank v. Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Honaker v. MahonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API