Legal Opinion

Manuel v. Weitzman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1971No. 14, June Term 1971, Docket No. 52,817PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

I

The Facts and Proceedings

Arthur Manuel was a customer at the Roxy Bar on July 24, 1964. He suffered serious injury to his ankle as a result of an attack by another customer, Patrick Carrigan.

Manuel and his wife, Violet, filed suit against Harry Weitzman, the bar owner, suing on four counts. Counts I and II, under the civil liability provision of the dramshop act (MCLA § 436.22 [Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 18.993]), alleged that Carrigan was served drinks after he was already intoxicated. Immediately before trial, these counts were settled for $5,000.

*161Counts III and IV alleged that defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kane v. Fields Corner Grille, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Blakeley v. White Star LineMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kangas v. SuchorskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. McFadden v. Bancroft Hotel Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bailey v. SchaafMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Millross v. Plum Hollow Golf ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Cooper v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API