McCullough v. Ward Trucking Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The primary- question in this case is governed by a changeless rule of the common law, written here many years ago and followed since by-most of the courts of the States as well as the courts of the United States. The “12 reasonable men [and women] appointed by the Constitution to determine disputed or doubtful questions of fact” have themselves disagreed. That is some evidence, by itself, that all reasonable persons would not agree with respect- to the conduct of this defendant driver as being negligent or prudent.1
*111• The decisional test comes from the pen of Mr. Justice Cooley, reflected in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Jones v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Lebel v. SwincickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hill v. Harbor Steel & Supply Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Fenimore v. Donald M. Drake Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Farwell v. KeatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Ingram v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Lapasinskas v. QuickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.