Legal Opinion

Alwood v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1956No. Civ. 21155PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendant city of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment rendered upon verdict for plaintiff in a personal injury action. Plaintiff’s ease is based upon the Public Liability Act, now found in sections 53050-53051, Government Code. Defendant does not directly attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict (except as to the issue of contributory negligence) and does not claim an excessive award of damages. Counsel do argue that the evidence establishes contributory negligence on plaintiff’s part and that it was the sole proximate cause of the accident; but the major contention is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hall v. Barber Door Co.California Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gallipo v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Ceja v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Laymon v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Agovino v. KunzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Campbell v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API