Legal Opinion
Laymon v. Simpson
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1964No. Civ. 302PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
This litigation had its inception in an intersection collision at Cornelia and Floral Avenues in Fresno County. The action was filed by Theodore R. Simpson; he alleged that Benjamin F. Laymon was negligent and responsible for the collision and the injuries suffered by him. Mr. Laymon answered and cross-complained against Mr. Simpson and his employer, California Milling Corporation. The jury brought in a verdict for the cross-complainant in the sum of $12,500. The plaintiff was represented by counsel of his choice; another attorney represented him and his employer as cross-defendants.
The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kanner v. Globe Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Gee v. California State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Waller v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Waller v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Crooks v. PirroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.