Legal Opinion

Hall v. Barber Door Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 12166PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon the granting of a motion for nonsuit made by defendant at the close of plaintiff’s case. Plaintiff also appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The latter order is nonappealable and, for that reason, the appeal therefrom is dismissed.

The facts upon which plaintiff bases his action are as follows: In the latter part of the year 1927 the Central Manufacturing District, as owner, entered into a contract with William P. Neil Company, whereby the latter, as general contractor, agreed to construct a building to be known as the Produce…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Dahms v. General Elevator Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Buckley v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Pettyjohn & Sons v. BashamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API